For readers of the book
You wrote predictions in Chapter One and scored them in Chapter Nine. This is the same instrument, expanded to twenty items, so you can see where your gap sits against everybody else’s.
Two things worth knowing before you start.
Readers score better than non-readers. Not by as much as you would hope, and the margin is smallest on the items where the correction is least comfortable. If you come out thirty points off after thirteen chapters about systematic misestimation, that is not a failure of attention. It is the machine from Chapter Eight, restarting — roughly on the schedule Chapter Fourteen predicted.
Ten of the twenty items are new. They are not in the book. Four of them cover findings the book reports but never puts a number on, which means finishing the book does not guarantee you the answer.
Chapter Nine named three claims as predictions rather than findings — specifically, that each sex badly misestimates the volume of contact the other receives. Those are being tested on this site. If the data contradicts them, that gets published on the sources page, not quietly dropped. It would be a strange book to write and then not do that.
Chapter Eleven’s protocol, in a form you can keep on your phone. Predict the answer in writing before you ask. The value is not in what they say — it is in the distance between their answer and what you wrote.
Question ten is the one worth saving. Almost nobody is ever asked it, and the answers tend to be immediate and slightly embarrassed — which is a reliable sign you have reached something real.